THERE is something very disquieting about the global reaction to events in Syria.
Earlier this week the United Nations' human rights chief Navi Pillay pointed out in a BBC interview there was reliable information that President Bashar al Assad's regime was systematically detaining and torturing children as part of its crackdown on opposition within the country.
What Ms Pillay outlined was horrendous, and included children who had been shot in the knees, some detained with adults in inhumane conditions and denied medical treatment for their wounds.
In the wake of her remarks, what followed was a disappointing deluge of comments on news websites that was very telling of what many people think about the idea of international intervention in the Syria conflict.
Many of the comments I read were from people who believed Ms Pillay was nothing more than a propagandist and bit-part player in a warmongering western conspiracy designed to lure us into another Middle Eastern war.
Give us the evidence that such atrocities exist, they demanded, as if what we are faced with in Syria is a dubious re-run of the weapons of mass destruction (WMD) proposition regarded by many as the con that took us to war in Iraq.
In the wake of the Iraq experience it's understandable there should be profound scepticism about the motives put forward by Western political leaders for intervening in any Middle East crisis – not that Ms Pillay was proposing any such course of action.
Having covered the revolutions in Egypt, Libya and now Syria, at times I've frankly been amazed at how predictably one-dimensional the counter-arguments to humanitarian intervention invariably are.
Almost always, they are near obsessionally and simplistically couched in terms of the West only really being interested and driven by its insatiable thirst for oil or some latter-day imperialistic determination to exert control over the Arab world.
I need no convincing about the insidious role oil has played in the West's foreign policy decision-making in the Middle East. Occasionally, though, the one-dimensional conspiracy theorists might do themselves a favour if they tried to look beyond this.
In doing so they need cast their gaze no further than the ongoing power struggle at the Arab League Summit convened in Baghdad yesterday. Even the most cursory examination of the tensions there reveal that besides petrol, there are other equally – if not more – powerful factors shaping the outcome of the Syrian crisis and wider Middle East.
At the heart of this battle lies rifts along sectarian lines, where Shi'ite Iran and Sunni Arab Gulf rivals tussle for influence.
Sunni-led Gulf nations like Saudi Arabia and Qatar remain determined to break Syria out of its alliance with Iran and talk increasingly of arming the Syrian rebels to fight Assad's forces.
Other non-Gulf Arab states however, such as Algeria, Egypt and Iraq's Shi'ite-led Government are more cautious, fearing that toppling Assad could see those sectarian tensions spark into full-blown violence.
An insight into Qatar's thinking on the Syrian crisis was summed up yesterday by the prime minister of the tiny, energy-rich nation. "We are faced with a difficult choice, either we stand by the Syrian people or stand by him (Assad)," said Sheik Hamad bin Jassim al-Thani, adding it would be a "disgrace to all of us if the sacrifices of the Syrian people go to waste".
And there lies the nub of the matter. Those who believe Ms Pillay's comments about Assad's regime targeting children are nothing but propaganda will probably go on thinking that way.
But from what I witnessed during a recent visit to the Syria-Turkey border there are no doubts about the degree of suffering experienced by innocent civilians in this conflict.
Calls for Syria to bring a ceasefire, and vocal support for UN-Arab League envoy Kofi Annan's peace plan is one thing, implementing it is something else.
While the Arab League bickers in Baghdad, and the West worries itself into diplomatic impotence, the killing and atrocities go on. Unpalatable as the thought is, I can't help thinking those Syrians brave enough to have stood up to Assad's dictatorship are disgracefully being left well and truly on their own.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article