Attempts to disrupt campaigning for Burma's historic by-elections tomorrow are "beyond acceptable", opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi said yesterday, in her first public appearance since falling ill last weekend.
"What has been happening in this country is really beyond what is acceptable for a democratic election. Still, we are determined to go forward because we think that is what our people want," a frail but defiant Mrs Suu Kyi, 66, said.
She accused her rivals of vandalising election posters, padding electoral registers and "many cases of intimidation", including two attempts to injure candidates with projectiles.
The US and European Union have hinted economic sanctions could be lifted if the election is free and fair.
The vote needs the blessing of Ms Suu Kyi. She is contesting one seat in her first election since being freed from house arrest in 2010.
Her National League for Democracy (NLD), competing for 44 of the 45 by-election seats, has complained of irregularities that could undermine the vote.
Burma's size, energy resources and ports have made it a vital energy security asset for China's western provinces, and a priority for Washington.
"There have been cases of vandalism of NLD signboards and posters and many, many cases of intimidation," said Ms Suu Kyi.
After 49 years of isolation and often brutal army rule, Burma has limited experience in holding ballots. The 2010 election was widely seen as rigged to favour the Union Solidarity and Development Party. But most diplomats say they believe Burma's rulers are sincere.
The NLD claims the president, who is supposed to be impartial, has tried to influence the vote.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article