Hundreds of protesters were in Cairo's Tahrir Square for a sixth day yesterday, demanding President Mohamed Mursi rescinds a decree they say gives him dictatorial powers, while two of Egypt's top courts stopped work in protest.
In scenes reminiscent of the popular uprising that unseated predecessor Hosni Mubarak, police fired tear gas at stone-throwers following protests by tens of thousands on Tuesday against the declaration expanding Mr Mursi's powers and putting his decisions beyond legal challenge.
Protesters say they will stay in Tahrir until the decree is withdrawn, bringing fresh turmoil to the nation and delivering a new blow to an economy already on the ropes.
Egypt's Cassation and Appeals courts said they would suspend their work until the constitutional court ruled on the decree.
A spokesman for the Supreme Constitutional Court, which declared the Islamist-led parliament void earlier this year, said it felt under attack by the president.
He said: "The really sad thing that has pained the members of this court is when the president of the republic joined the campaign of continuous attack on the Constitutional Court."
Senior judges have been negotiating with Mr Mursi about how to restrict his new powers, while protesters want him to dissolve an Islamist-dominated assembly that is drawing up a new constitution and which Mr Mursi protected from legal review.
Any deal to calm the streets will likely need to address both issues. Many protesters want the cabinet to be sacked too.
Mr Mursi's administration insists his actions were aimed at breaking a political log-jam to push Egypt more swiftly towards democracy, an assertion his opponents dismiss.
Two people have been killed in violence since the decree, while low-level clashes between protesters and police have gone on for days near Tahrir.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article