TAXI drivers in Barcelona staged noisy protests as part of a 24-hour strike against a controversial taxi app which connects passengers with private drivers.
The strike left the Catalan capital's El Prat airport and main railway station almost without taxis, and follows similar protests in other major European cities, including London, last month.
A smaller strike was also expected in Madrid, but members of the city's largest taxi union did not take part and taxis were readily available in the city centre.
The strikes were the latest salvo in an ongoing dispute between taxi drivers and the providers of the new app.
Taxi drivers are concerned about the threat to their livelihoods posed by the Uber app.
But the Spanish government told strikers they will have to compete with new technologies.
Barcelona is the only Spanish city where Uber is currently in use, and the regional Catalan government has threatened drivers using it with fines of up to £5,000 and the seizure of their vehicles.
A spokeswoman for Uber said last month's protests had boosted new users in London by 850 per cent as people tried to cope with the gridlock.
The company, which is based in San Francisco and backed by Google and Goldman Sachs, has come under increasing pressure to be more transparent about its tax set-up.
Taxi associations claim Uber routes its payments through the Netherlands to minimise corporation tax payments in France, the UK and Germany - in a similar manner to Apple and Starbucks, which have found themselves under criticism.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article