A ceasefire that went into effect in eastern Ukraine has largely held, except around the strategic railway hub of Debaltseve.
Heavy fog shrouding sodden fields muffled the sound of artillery but regular shelling could still be heard from Luhanske, a town about nine miles to the north west.
The ceasefire has kindled slender hopes of reprieve from the conflict between the government troops and Russian-backed separatists that has claimed more than 5,300 lives since it began in April.
International attention will be focused in the coming days on Debaltseve, where Ukrainian forces have for weeks been fending off severe onslaughts from the rebels. The town is a railway link between the main separatist-held cities of Donetsk and Luhansk.
A spokesman for the Ukrainian army general staffsaid the ceasefire had largely been upheld after it went into effect at midnight.
Shelling was noted 10 times, he said, with all but one incident occurring in the Debaltseve area. The rebels also accused the Ukrainians of deploying artillery in the area shortly after midnight.
Donetsk, the separatist stronghold, was quiet with no shelling from government forces.
In the Luhansk region, two civilians were killed shortly after midnight in the town of Popasne as a result of shelling, regional authorities said.
Speaking to his Russian counterpart Sergey Lavrov yesterday, US secretary of state John Kerry expressed concern about what he called efforts by Russia and the separatists to cut off Debaltseve in advance of the ceasefire.
But Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko, as he issued the ceasefire order in a live television broadcast, said the road to the town remained open and that Ukrainian troops there had been resupplied with ammunition.
Russia has repeatedly denied Western claims it has sent troops and equipment to aid the rebels.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article