Yemeni ex-president Ali Abdullah Saleh is suspected of corruptly amassing as much as £40 billion, equivalent to Yemen's annual GDP, during his long rule, and colluding in a militia takeover last year, UN-appointed investigators have told the Security Council.
The report by the world body's Panel of Experts on Yemen echoes criticism by his opponents that Mr Saleh's rule from 1978 to 2012 was marred by corruption, and that even out of office he is fomenting instability - allegations he has consistently denied.
Presented with the experts' 54-page findings, the Council has voted unanimously to extend sanctions on Mr Saleh and two top militia leaders, first targeted by the world body in November for their alleged role in destabilising the country.
In an interview last year, Mr Saleh denied any corruption during his tenure.
His party has also rejected allegations by Mr Saleh's critics that he or his son Ahmad Ali, once one of Yemen's top military commanders, had had a hand in the fall of the capital Sanaa.
Most of this wealth was believed to have been transferred abroad under false names or the names of others holding the assets on his behalf, the report said. It took the form of property, cash, shares, gold and other valuable commodities, and was believed to spread across at least 20 countries.
Mr Saleh was ousted in the wake of the 2011 Arab Spring protests, after 33 years at the head of one of the Arab world's most fractious and - despite modest energy reserves - impoverished countries.
He has remained a power-broker, and frequently criticised his successor, Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi, in the months running up to the invasion of Sanaa in September by a Shi'ite Muslim rebel group that eventually swept Hadi from power and opened up a political vacuum.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article