The United States now has little doubt the Syrian government used chemical weapons against civilians last week, and President Barack Obama is considering how to respond..
Syria yesterday agreed to let chemical weapons experts visit the site and the UN said it would start its investigation today - a move the US said had come too late.
The office of UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said in a statement that Syria had promised to observe a ceasefire at the site in the suburbs of Damascus while a UN team begins "on-site fact-finding activities".
The experts arrived in Damascus three days before a mass poisoning killed many hundreds of people on Wednesday in what appears to have been the world's worst chemical weapons attack in 25 years.
"Based on the reported number of victims, reported symptoms of those who were killed or injured, witness accounts and other facts gathered by open sources, the US intelligence community, and international partners, there is very little doubt at this point that a chemical weapon was used by the Syrian regime against civilians in this incident,"said a senior official in the US administration.
"We are continuing to assess the facts so the president can make an informed decision about how to respond to this indiscriminate use of chemical weapons."
The official made clear the Syrian government's agreement to let UN inspectors visit the site was inadequate.
"At this juncture, any belated decision by the regime to grant access to the UN team would be considered too late to be credible, including because the evidence available has been significantly corrupted as a result of the regime's persistent shelling and other intentional actions over the last five days," the official said.
The US official said the administration had seen reports that Syria would provide access, but said that if the government had nothing to hide, it would have allowed investigators to visit the site five days ago.
Meanwhile, Russia welcomed the move by the Syrian Foreign Ministry and warned against the "tragic mistake" of jumping to conclusions before the investigation is completed.
Senior US lawmakers have called for limited US military action in response to the alleged chemical weapons attack.
"I certainly would do cruise missile strikes," said Eliot Engel, the ranking Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
Senator Bob Corker, the top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, told Fox News he thought Obama would "respond in a surgical way".
"I hope the president as soon as we get back to Washington will ask for authorisation from Congress to do something in a very surgical and proportional way," he said.
Two other Republican senators, John McCain and Lindsey Graham, issued a statement calling for "stand-off" strikes, such as by cruise missiles, to degrade the government's air power and help establish "safe areas" on the ground.
David Cameron and Mr Obama had earlier pledged a "serious response The Prime Minister and the US President discussed the growing crisis by telephone on Saturday night and have ordered officials to examine all options.
In response, Syria had warned the United States against any military action. "US military intervention will create a very serious fallout and a ball of fire that will inflame the Middle East," Syrian Information Minister Omran Zoabi was quoted as saying.
Mr Obama authorised sending US weapons to Syrian rebels in June, but shipments were delayed due to fears that radical Islamist groups in the opposition could gain further ground in Syria and become a threat to the West.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article