An 88-year-old veteran of Tunisia's political establishment has won the country's presidency, according to official results, capping a four-year-long democratic transition.
Beji Caid Essebsi campaigned on restoring the "prestige of the state" and a return to stability from the years of turmoil that followed the North African country's 2011 overthrow of dictator Zine El Abidine Ben Ali that kicked off the regional pro-democracy uprisings of the Arab Spring.
It is a measure of the country's yearning for a return to stability after four hard years that a revolution of the youth calling for change and social justice has ended up electing such a symbol of the old regime.
Mr Essebsi, who received 55.68% of the vote, once served as Ben Ali's speaker of parliament and before that was both foreign and interior minister for his predecessor, Habib Bourguiba.
His rival, outgoing interim president Moncef Marzouki, who made his name defending human rights against Ben Ali, received 44.32% of the vote. Exit polls had predicted similar results soon after polls closed on Sunday night.
Voting was largely pronounced free and fair, with a participation rate of 60%, less than the nearly 70% in the previous round and in recent legislative elections.
Riots did erupt on Sunday night in the southern industrial city of Gabes, where youths protested against the results and clashed with police. After several were arrested, the clashes began anew on Monday and two police stations were burned.
The voting split on geographical lines, with the affluent northern and coastal regions - the traditional home of Tunisia's leadership - voting for Mr Essebsi while the more impoverished and neglected south and interior voted for Mr Marzouki.
Tunisia's powerful Islamist party Ennahda officially remained neutral but its supporters are believed to have backed Mr Marzouki.
As interior minister in the 1980s, Mr Essebsi helped jail many Islamists.
Mr Essebsi claimed victory on Sunday night and reached out to Mr Marzouki's supporters, calling for everyone to work together to overcome the country's grave economic challenges.
ends
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article