Taliban leader Mullah Mohammad Omar has backed peace talks with the Afghan government, a week after milestone meetings between the two sides in Pakistan.
The message represented the first word in the name of Mullah Omar on the budding peace process that has deeply split the Afghan insurgents' leadership.
Issued ahead of the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Fitr, the message said the Taliban had a legal right to meet Afghan and foreign officials, as long as Islamic ideals were respected in the process.
"Peaceful interactions with the enemies is not prohibited" under Islamic tradition, said the statement published on a website linked to the Taliban.
"The objective behind our political endeavours ... is to bring an end to the occupation."
The Taliban have been fighting since their overthrow in 2001 to expel US-led foreign forces and the US-backed government in Kabul.
Most foreign troops left last year but at least 13,000 remain, most of them training Afghan forces.
Afghanistan and Pakistan said last week's talks were the first official meeting between representatives and that all parties had agreed to start a process.
The Taliban's leadership, however, is known to be divided on the issue, with political chief Akhtar Mohammad Mansour - who frequently speaks for Mullah Omar - in favour of negotiation and top battlefield commander Abdul Qayum Zakir against them.
Mullah Omar, who headed the Taliban's hardline Islamist rule over Afghanistan for five years, has not been seen in public since the US-led intervention in 2001.
Some disgruntled Taliban factions have suggested he is either dead or very ill and others may be making statements in his name.
The new statement did not include audio or a video.
In April, the Taliban published a 5,000 word biography that said their chief was alive, well and in regular contact with the world.
Despite efforts to reassure Taliban commanders, some of their fighters have defected to Islamic State (IS), led by the charismatic Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.
The new statement made reference to IS, saying: "We have...directed all our mujahideen to preserve their unity and forcefully prevent all those elements who attempt to create differences."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article