A United Nations agency said it has "serious concern" about coral bleaching on Australia's Great Barrier Reef as it urged the government to work faster to improve water quality in the region.
Unesco said in a draft report to the World Heritage Committee released in Paris on the state of conservation of World Heritage-listed properties that "climate change remains the most significant overall threat to the future" of the 1,400-mile coral expanse.
"It is recommended that the committee express its serious concern at the coral bleaching and mortality that occurred" over the previous two south hemisphere summers, the report said.
Unesco was also critical of Australia, saying "progress toward achieving water quality targets has been slow".
The agency recommended that Australia be asked in a final report to "accelerate its efforts to reach the quality targets" it set out in a reef conservation plan in December.
The government plans to improve water quality through reduced agricultural run-off of fertiliser and pesticides, and by reducing the number of trees being cleared along the Queensland state coast.
The committee noted that a law to regulate land clearing had yet to be passed by the state government.
A study of coral bleaching on the reef, published in the journal Nature in March, found 91% of the reef had been bleached at least once during three events of the past two decades, the most serious event occurring last year.
The government authority in charge of the reef marine park reported to a Senate committee in May that as much as half of the 133,000 square miles of coral might already be dead due to bleaching.
The Australian government welcomed the report and said it would work with the Queensland government on the matter of water quality targets.
"It is critical for reefs worldwide, including the Great Barrier Reef, that international efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions are effective," foreign minister Julie Bishop and environment minister Josh Frydenberg said in a joint statement.
The government said the draft decision confirmed that its reef conservation plan had been effective.
The report found the plan had been effective in banning dredged material from being dumped on the reef and restricting new port developments.
The UN World Heritage Committee is considering the draft findings at its meeting under way in Krakow, Poland.
Robert Leck, head of oceans at environmental group WWF-Australia, said the biggest threats to the reef were climate change, poor water quality and excessive tree clearing which increases polluted run-off.
"On all three fronts, Unesco has concerns on progress in tackling these issues," Mr Leck said in a statement.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel