A man accused of ramming his car into a crowd of counter-protesters at a white nationalist rally in Virginia has been denied bail after the public defender’s office said it could not represent him and the judge was forced to find a local lawyer to fill in.
James Alex Fields Jr, 20, appeared in court via video link dressed in a black-and-white striped uniform. He has been charged with offences including second-degree murder.
He answered questions from the judge with simple responses of “Yes, sir” when asked if he understood what he was being told.
Fields replied “No, sir” when asked if he had ties to the community of Charlottesville.
Judge Robert Downer set an August 25 hearing for the 20-year-old.
Judge Downer said the public defender’s office informed him it could not represent Fields because a relative of someone in the office was injured in Saturday’s protest. He appointed local lawyer Charles Weber to represent him.
Fields is charged over the death of Heather Heyer, 32, of Charlottesville, who died after a car that police said Fields was driving slammed into a crowd of people protesting against the nationalist rally in Charlottesville on Saturday.
(Alan Goffinski/AP)
Fields was arrested shortly afterwards and taken into custody.
Police allege Fields drove his silver Dodge Challenger through a crowd of protesters in Charlottesville, killing Ms Heyer and wounding 19 other people.
A Virginia State Police helicopter deployed in a large-scale police response to the violence then crashed into the woods outside of town and both troopers on board died.
Fields had been photographed hours earlier with a shield bearing the emblem of Vanguard America, one of the hate groups that took part in the “take America back” campaign to protest against the removal of a Confederate statue.
The group has denied any association with the suspect.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article