Munir Emkidah is a Syrian refugee and former human rights activist who fled to the UK after war broke out in 2012.
His family escaped soon afterwards, first to Jordan and he was later reunited with them in Glasgow four years ago. However, his mother, brother and sister are still living in southern Syria. He says action from the West is overdue.
“These strikes are very very late. The regime has used chemical weapons several times, not just in the Khan Shaykhun attack that has been covered in the media, but others nobody heard about,” he said.
“My mother, brother and sister are all living in the south of Syria in an area under opposition control close to Israel and Jordan.
“The people there are under siege from Assad and the terrorist groups like Hezbollah. They are killing people and after the attack in Douma in the south last week, they were terrified the regime would use chemical weapons against them too.
“I have heard from my sister with texts and when they can get use of the internet and they are fine at the moment.
“Even though they are late, the airstrikes are welcome because they send a very strong message to the Assad regime that they can’t use chemical weapons any more. Civilian people have to be protected from the regime.
“But there are other kids of weapons. We need to end this war and bring the regime to peace talks in Geneva, so that the people of Syria can be free.Will the airstrikes do that? I am worried. We need to remove the regime to create normal life, democracy and freedom, but because the regime is backed by Iran and Russia and because Assad thinks he has won the war, why go to peace talks?
“Until Russian involvement this was only going in one direction but now I don’t know.
I do know that when evil people do these things, particularly killing civilians. the whole world is responsible.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel