The US Senate has confirmed Gina Haspel as the CIA’s first female director despite her role in one of the darkest chapters in the spy agency’s history.
It voted on Thursday by 54-45 after a tough nomination process.
Ms Haspel was a controversial choice because of her role in a former CIA programme to brutally detain and interrogate terror suspects at covert sites abroad following the 9/11 attacks.
Her opponents said it was wrong to promote someone who supervised a black site in Thailand.
They said the US needs to close the book forever on the programme that marred America’s image with allies abroad.
Raha Wala of Human Rights First said the Senate’s decision was unwise.
He said Human Rights First was putting Ms Haspel on notice that Congress and the American people will hold her to her pledge to never reinstate such a programme.
Laura Pitter of Human Rights Watch said Ms Haspel’s confirmation is a “perverse byproduct of the US failure to grapple with past abuses”.
Ms Haspel’s supporters cited her 33-year career at the agency.
Senator Marco Rubio said: “With her unparalleled CIA experience, she will hit the ground running and continue to lead the world’s finest intelligence agency.
“I look forward to working with her as she helps advance and protect America’s national security interests from the daily threats we face.”
Former top intelligence officials said she earned the chance to take the helm of the agency.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here