Every Tuesday night, my husband goes out and I indulge my secret shame.
I pull down the blinds, unplug the phone, pour a glass of red wine . . . and watch River City.
While not all the storylines float my boat, there's just something about that show. I'm not the only one smitten. This week Superfan Annabel Goldie led a Member's Debate at the Scottish Parliament celebrating the 10th anniversary of the BBC's Scottish soap.
Cynics might deem this too trivial for parliamentary debate but its importance to Scotland's film and TV industry cannot be over-played. What with the near demise of Taggart, where else do young Scots actors go to hone their skills? Likewise for seasoned home talent such as Una McLean, Johnny Beattie and the splendid Eileen McCallum – it has been a Godsend.
What's more, it is very watchable and delivers what few other soaps can; genuine humour. The pithy one-liners and withering put-downs characteristic of West Coast banter are captured perfectly.
The current gangster storyline does nothing for me, but the development of the character Ruth's long struggle with mental ill-health was refreshing in that it actually tackled surrounding issues instead of associating mental illness only with the comedy villian.
Likewise, Bob O'Hara's character having to untangle his web of macho excuses and face up to his obsesity could not be more relevant and is a brave step away from jolly fat gags which are often the lot of the over-sized actor. Soaps are a powerful medium. While a documentary can be thought-provoking at best, preachy at worst, soaps portray accepted social mores and can influence in a far more subtle way by inserting opinions into the mouths of "folk like us".
But before we get carried away, River City is an entertaining hour on a Tuesday night when you're meant to be walking the dog.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article