The world is divided into two types of people.
Early risers and night hawks. As a bona fide night hawk, I have always regarded early birds with a mixture of awe and suspicion. Brandishing their cheery morning perkiness, they have always appeared a generally more organised, efficient breed.
As a life-long late sleeper, dawn has remained a largely unexperienced part of the day. I've had to force myself out of bed at unspeakable hours for various jobs but have managed to essentially sleep-walk through proceedings while tanked up on copious amounts of coffee and with my senses on stand-by. Whenever a long lie presented itself, I relished the luxury of remaining in a cocoon-like state for as long as possible. Recently, however, I have found myself waking earlier, in that uncharted territory before the alarm first goes off. Perhaps its advancing age or creeping worries of the impending doom of mankind, or possibly that pesky cockerel that the neighbours insist upon keeping, but I'm now up with the larks.
When I first blink I'm invariably met with the jubilant gaze of my bearded collie, who begins a two-paw plea for an early morning walk. Which is why I now frequently find myself tramping across our local park at a time when most folk are blindly slamming the snooze button.
But there is something particularly delicious about feeling like the first person to be up and about. A smugness that comes from knowing that others still loll, unwashed, in their beds. What thrills to kick up the undisturbed dew and savour the precious, fleeting calm before the gears of the day have started to grind. To catch the morning mist aglow in the sunshine is a treat to behold. I think I'm a convert. There is a downside to all this dawn activity, however: the inevitable mid-afternoon crash.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article