Not long ago, I passed by a young family having a picnic in a Glasgow park. The wee boy had found something in the undergrowth and rushed to show it to his dad.
“Hey, dude, what‘ve you got there?” said the father.
Dude? In Glasgow?
The last speaker of a northern Scots dialect has just died. Maybe all variants of Scottish will die out soon. It’s got a lot going against it.
I remember a teacher who insisted her pupils speak ‘proper’ English at all times. She thought using words like ’bried’, ‘maw’, ‘dug’ etc made you sound, as she put it, ‘backward’.
One incident sticks in my memory. She was hooting derisively at a girl’s description of ‘clapping’ a dog. She insisted on ‘patting’.
I now realise she was just a very ignorant woman. Scottish kings up to James VI would undoubtedly have talked about ‘clapping’ their horses. What damage did people like her do to the self-worth of tens of thousands of Scots?
And what’s with those middle class types who think a warped, BBC Queen’s English is the right way to talk? I once had a colleague who arrived at work white-faced and shaking telling us that she had just seen a “terrible cresh”. Mangled pronunciation aside, it did conjure up a lovely image of a kindergarten for scary weans!
Now though, it’s the globalisation of American culture through television, the cinema and the internet which is the biggest threat to what remains of the Scottish language.
A few minutes earlier during my walk in the park, I encountered a young couple just as they met up.
“You’re late, babes,” said the woman.
“I’m really sorry, babe,” was her beau’s reply.
Babe? Babes? In Glasgow?
In a supermarket the same day, a wee girl was helping her mammy with the shopping. She pointed to some packets of biscuits.
“Not today, honey,” said the mother.
Honey? In Glasgow?
When someone couldn’t help me with directions, his “Sorry, mate” made me nostalgic for the old Glaswegian “Jim”!
The day was complete later in a restaurant when my wife and I were greeted by “What would you guys like to order?”
Guys? In Glasgow?
Crivvins, we’re in our sixties! And is calling a woman ‘guy’ now a mark of equality? If so, then it’s a shame if we’ve lost that wonderful endearment, ‘hen’.
Almost inevitably these days, when the food was served we were invited to “Enjoy!” If restaurant staff have to say such meaningless things, could it be not a Scottish meaningless thing like ‘Gustie!’? The tourists at least would love it.
The waiter also had that exasperating, mid-Atlantic way of talking that so many Scots have adopted. You know, where the intonation rises at the end of a sentence. Even when it’s not aquestion.
And can we please ban the word ‘like’ when it’s used – like - in the middle of a – like - sentence for - like- no good purpose? However, I do realise this would cause great problems for the under thirties for whom the word ‘like’ appears to be an essential prop for –like – communication nowadays.
It’ll be a long struggle to defend the language against the onslaught of downloads, apps, Twitter, Facebook as well as Hollywood movies – what ever happened, by the way, to ‘cinema’, ‘films’ or ‘flics’?
Wouldn’t it be great if the first step of the fightback could be the reinstatement of Scottish endearments?
“What have you got there, laddie?” says the father to his son.
“You’re late, my bonnie doo.” The lovers meet. “I’m sorry, my jo.”
In this way, we might – like - begin to delete some of the current mid-Atlantic horrors and bring back –like - into use some of the treasures of the Scots language.
Whit dae ye think, dudes?
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article