DOUBTLESS it was due to nothing more than happy coincidence that my mother delivered me on the same date as Robert Louis Stevenson's mother did him.
For the record, and for those of you who still send cards, it is November 13, the year – in Stevenson's case – being 1850. This is one of the reasons why I feel a special affinity for a writer who I have no hesitation in declaring Scotland's greatest. While others may prefer Burns or Scott or Irvine Welsh, the Edinburgh-born author of such classic novels as Kidnapped and Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde is for me simply peerless.
You might think, therefore, that my heart would leap at the thought that the 162nd anniversary of his birth is to be designated RLS Day. It has been so called by the Edinburgh UNESCO City of Literature, a publicly funded body whose raison d'etre, eight years after it was founded, still eludes me. Hoping to do for Stevenson what Bloomsday does for James Joyce, the occasion will apparently be marked with fans of his work wearing daft moustaches and velvet jackets and various events vaguely related to literature. Don't say you weren't warned.
Says Ali Bowden, director of the trust that runs the City of Literature: "RLS Day is our way of raising a glass to one of Edinburgh's most famous sons and keeping his spirit alive. Edinburgh keeps Robert Louis Stevenson in its heart and mind all year round: he's remembered on plaques and in bookshops; in St Giles' Cathedral and Princes Street Gardens, reading lists and cinema screens. But it's lovely to have an excuse to throw a party."
Throwing parties, it seems, is what an organisation like the City of Literature is really rather good at. Nor ought this to be mocked, though one would prefer there to be greater emphasis on the work than on the play. By another astonishing coincidence I was involved a quarter of a century and more ago in bringing to fruition a festival devoted to all things RLS, including readings, lectures, films and an exhibition of the illustrations Ralph Steadman drew for Treasure Island. The highlight, however, was the first ever (and only) Stevenson Supper, which began with a schooner of "Yo-ho-ho" rum and ended with "Pieces of Eight", ie a well-known brand of post-prandial mints.
Despite Ms Bowden's protestations, I wonder to what extent the good folk of our capital and beyond really know of Stevenson and his books. Statues and plaques are all very well but what maintains a writer's flame is the availability of his books. Apart from those already mentioned these are not easy to come by outwith the dwindling number of secondhand bookshops or via the internet.
There are, of course, libraries, to which serious readers still devoutly go. But by the time Edinburgh's Central Library opened, in 1890, Stevenson was resident in Samoa where, one gathers, the natives are much better informed about him than his immediate kinsfolk. Such is often the fate of those who choose to live in foreign parts. Muriel Spark suffered similarly. Like Stevenson, she was "an exile in heart and mind – cautious, affectionate, critical". Edinburgh, she added, was the kind of place in which she could never hope to be understood. Like Stevenson, too, only a few of her books are readily available. Even among those who say they insist they are well-read it is relatively rare to come across someone who has delved deeper into her oeuvre than The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie.
The problem with Stevenson is his association with children's literature which allowed myopic critics and ignorant academics to question his seriousness. In recent decades, however, there have been signs that this is changing, leading to an overdue reassessment of his achievement which, by any standard, was phenomenal, especially given the fact he died in his early 40s. Here was a man who excelled at whatever he attempted – short stories, travelogues, novels and novellas, poetry, essays and letters. Moreover, and more importantly, his style has endured and shows no sign of turning antique, like Scott's. And that, when all the partying is over, is what really matters.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article