LIKE you, I'm immensely excited by the forthcoming film of The Hobbit.
But I'm also worried. A weakness of Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings films was the absence of Tom Bombadil. You know who I mean. He's the embodiment of a nature spirit, jolly, colourful, kind and indestructible.
He's my favourite Tolkien character, along with Beorn. But both figure in essentially passing episodes, diversions almost, and so perhaps aren't amenable to the linear action required of a film script. So I am — or was — worried that Beorn would be ditched from The Hobbit. I say "was" because I read now that there will be a Beorn, played by Swedish actor Mikael Persbrandt. Hooray for him. I hope they don't edit him out.
Beorn, for those of you edited out of the loop, is a brawny, independent character who can change into a bear – true story – in which guise he mangles Orcs. He lives on his own steading, surrounded by his animals, is vegetarian and fond of honey. He sounds like a goodie two-shoes but, boy, you don't want to rile him.
Even Gandalf the wizard is slightly afraid of him. And yet he's mostly a man, and mortal (doomed to die some time) certainly. Marjorie Burns, in her book Perilous Realms, describes him as "distinctive, free, self-reliant but respectful of other lives and hostile only to those deserving hostility". Like many, even most, Tolkien characters, he comes across as essentially Pagan, despite the author's personal Christianity.
Burns says Beorn best exemplifies Tolkien's ability to balance two cultural ideals: "comradeship and solitude, freedom and obligation, forest and garden, home and wayside, risk and security". These dichotomies run through all our lives. However, there can be no dichotomies in the new film trilogy. He's either in or out. And he'd better be in.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article