HOT on the heels, or at least flippers, of a talking whale, comes an elephant speaking Korean.
You may laugh, but how many Korean words do you know? Zactly: nane. Koshik knows only five words – so more than the average Scottish footballer – but they sound pretty authentic.
He doesn't know what they mean (he is an animal and therefore, by definition, thick) but he presents a fair facsimile by bunging his trunk into his gob and squeezing the words oot past it. Koshik is speaking out of sheer desperation, as he's lonely. The words he has learned mean "hello", "sit doon", "naw", "lie doon", and "guid" or "good", if you will.
The talking whale, christened Moby Diction, didn't mouth words so much as human-style sounds. He sounded like a kazoo and was clearly talking out his blowhole, but at least he put in the effort. These guys join the ranks of parrots, long famed for mouthing off quite eloquently, often accompanied by an intelligent-looking inclining of the heid, as if they were trying to understand us.
Well, good luck with that. We don't understand us. If only they could talk. That's the oft-expressed sentiment regarding our four-legged, two-clawed, single-blowholed friends.
Their list of complaints would surely be voluminous. Stop eating/clubbing/hunting us for fun might be among the topics mentioned.
But I'm not holding my breath, partly because it's difficult to speak when you do that. It's possible that our dumb chums might lose some of their charm if they start indulging in small talk.
Before they knew where they were, they'd be badmouthing each other and gossiping. The Chinese sage said: "Those who know do not speak. Those who speak do not know." But that, as I've said before, was easy for him to say.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article