You never actually own a church; you merely look after it for the next generation (Letters, October 29, 31 & November 6).
The value of St George's Tron church (built 1807) was not created by the current congregation; outreach and social mission at the Tron is not unique to them and is built on the work of others.
The sentiments expressed in recent letters from its members reflect a selfishness and arrogance that is at odds with our tradition and their much-stated Christian beliefs.
They take it upon themselves to decide who in Scotland is deserving of their charitable support; in fact the Kirk nationally has many ministry, social care and support programmes covering the whole country and funded by contributions from all congregations; except, it seems, St George's Tron who no longer contribute to the common good, nor do they agree with the Kirk's management, its mission, outreach or its theology.
The diverging attitudes between the Church of Scotland and Rev William Philip were evident for many years before the matter of gay ministry became a cause: his close association with the Proclamation Trust, with whom he worked for five years before coming to Glasgow, and its Evangelical Ministry Assembly, is of many years' standing and the trust's subsidiary, Cornhill Scotland, was set up by him in 2006.
They have had a notable impact on what was a traditional Scottish parish church.
If their belief is so strong as to require a break with the national church then let that break be total; they should leave behind the Tron buildings and the manse; let them rent an empty shop or find an open field in the hills as did the Covenanters, where they may worship in their own way.
To do so would be an admirable proclamation of their faith; to do less brings their actions and attitudes into question.
St George's Tron has had its place in the centre of Glasgow and its people for two centuries. It should not be diverted by a few short years of imported evangelism and it is the responsibility of the Church of Scotland to look after it.
Paul Scott,
13 West Tollcross,
Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article