The current controversy over the BBC should not be allowed to obscure the excellent value for money the corporation provides in every field from the fabulous entertainment of Strictly Come Dancing to the fascinating and wholly uncommercial output on Radio 3 and Radio 4.
The BBC is not just a TV service, and a significant error in the current debate is the focus on investigative journalism on Newsnight, ie on one element of one programme, on one channel in one medium ("Newsnight executives in firing line", The Herald, November 14).
In the current political context in Scotland, the BBC has a further vital role in bringing wider and more critical perspectives to the referendum debate than those offered by the Scottish media. I know I am not alone in having welcomed the healthy scepticism of Jeremy Paxman directed at Alex Salmond on Newsnight, and the insistence of David Dimbleby that Nicola Sturgeon should provide answers on Question Time, to quote two notable instances.
It is already an unfortunate by-product of the referendum issue that many other political debates (EU membership and Trident) risk being relegated to subsets of "Independence: Yes or No." The BBC – and especially BBC News – is an essential real-world antidote to this reductive trend.
Peter A Russell,
87 Munro Road,
Glasgow.
The BBC has some very serious issues to address but to describe it as "mediocre and self-seeking", as Ian F Mackay does, is ludicrous (Letters, November 13).
The BBC's output is second to none. It is full of superb programmes on TV and radio backed by an excellent website. We should recognise this and sing its praises. It does make mistakes from time to time – as do all large organisations – but this should never be allowed to detract from the overall quality of what it produces.
The corporation produces amazing wildlife, drama, sport, music and entertainment programmes as well as documentaries such as Planet Earth and most recently Operation Iceberg. We would be vastly poorer without it.
Those who moan about the licence fee should reflect on the fact the BBC gives us access to a huge range of high quality television and radio stations (without any interruptions for advertisements).
Many of us pay considerably more for a multitude of cable and satellite channels. Now there is mediocrity.
Alasdair Young,
19 Baronshill Avenue,
Linlithgow.
IN all the furore over events at the BBC, we should take care not to play into the hands of far less benign forces. The Murdoch empire and many politicians would be only too delighted for the BBC to lose funding and come under closer political control.
The Murdochs have been trying for years to achieve this; Tony Blair somehow managed it with the Hutton inquiry. Do we really want the activities of Mr Blair, the Murdochs and their ilk to be even further freed from scrutiny? I certainly would not want this, so let's remember what might be lost in the welter of criticism over one ill-judged and possibly ill-researched programme.
Dr RM Morris,
Veslehaug,
Polesburn,
Methlick, Ellon.
AS someone who has experience of the working practices of both the BBC and several other publicly funded bodies I can assure any concerned citizens that the running of the BBC is exemplary by comparison.
James Young,
90 Mitchell Street,
Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article