I SUPPOSE they'd be deemed politically incorrect nowadays, but the Hans Breitmann poems of Charles Leland are harmless and a right good laugh.
Written in cod-German, they focus on three noble themes: drinking, eating and women.
Published in 1871, they also affect self-interested chivalry: "Der noble Ritter Hugo/Von Schwillensaufenstein/Rode out mid shper and helmet/Und he coom to de panks of de Rhine.
"Und oop dere rose a meermaid/Vot hadn't got nodings on/Und she say, 'Oh, Ritter Hugo/Vhere you goes mit yourself alone?'"
It transpires Hugo's out for a beer. She invites him into the water where there are "heaps of dings to see". These include fish and trunks of treasure, including spoons. He isn't impressed, until she mentions the gold-red wine, and down he goes, dragged by his troosers.
The relentless light rhythm of Leland's lines drags the reader in too but, somehow, the effect is uplifting. Leland was, in no particular order, an American humourist, folklorist and journalist. He took part (on the goodies' side) in the revolution of 1848 in France. He also fought against slavers in the American Civil War.
Though best known to me for Hans Breitmann's Ballads, he's better known to other for his Neo-Pagan perorations. He thought he'd discovered another Celtic language, but this turned out be cobblers. Hans Breitmann, too, is cobblers, but gloriously daft. Here's another sample: "Hans Breitmann gife a barty/Ve all cot troonk ash bigs/I poot mine mout' to a parrel of beer/Und empited it oop mit a schwigs."
The name Hans Breitmann would normally sound teutonic and curtly macho but, here, it's absurd. Let's not forget Matilda Yane, who valtzet round and round ("De pootiest Fraulein in de house/She Vayed 'pout dwo hoondred pound").
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article