OPENNESS and transparency were among the founding principles of the Scottish Parliament – yet Holyrood has been found wanting.
It emerged almost by accident that last month the First Minister misinformed MSPs about the number of jobs created by his renewable energy drive.
Mr Salmond insists it was an accidental slip which he subsequently corrected in the Parliament's Official Report, the verbatim account of proceedings in the chamber and in committee, or Holyrood's Hansard.
But that clandestine corrections procedure gives as much cause for the concern as the First Minister's somewhat shaky grasp, in recent weeks at least, of basic facts and figures. His office emailed parliamentary officials to correct the error on November 15, within the 20 workings days period of grace allowed to MSPs who realise they have erred. As it turns out, his officials failed to follow the correct procedure so the First Minister's figure exaggerating the jobs boost from green energy was only changed yesterday.
Even then it was only changed on the initiative of parliamentary staff who chased up the original, inadequate email. And they only did that after Mr Salmond was challenged on his figures by an eagle-eyed energy expert who was told, incorrectly, the Official Report had already been amended.
Corrections are recorded both on the Official Record and on Parliament's website but there is a strong chance those mechanisms, on their own, would have not have alerted anyone to the error.
In Douglas Adams's The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, which is only slightly more surreal than some of the goings on at Holyrood, the hapless hero complains that plans for the destruction of earth were displayed "in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying: 'Beware of the Leopard.'" That's rather how Parliament advertises corrections to the Official Report.
The present procedure, which was introduced in 2010, does not require Parliament to flag up corrections in its daily Business Bulletin which gives details of committee meetings, debates and motions. Nor does it place MSPs under any obligation to make their changes public. The guidelines state merely: "Members may also wish to inform other members of their correction, especially if the incorrect information was given in direct response to another contribution."
Mr Salmond chose not to do so on this occasion.
It transpires that six corrections have been made this year. In March Mr Salmond also exaggerated a rise in female employment. In September, Environment Minister Paul Wheelhouse exaggerated the effect of last year's cold winter in knocking efforts to tackle climate change off course. Small errors, perhaps, but such mistakes can be powerfully helpful in the cut and thrust of debate.
Holyrood's Standards and Procedures Committee should act to ensure corrections are highlighted and given due prominence as soon as they are made. Presiding Officer Tricia Marwick has not been afraid of reform, introducing topical question to hold ministers to account more quickly and promising better post-legislative scrutiny. Quiet corrections to the Official Report remain a loophole that needs to be closed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article