If there is nowhere left to discover in the world, at least there is Lawrence of Arabia.
At least, in that film, we can follow Lawrence across the desert, which is the great villain, the great hero and the great beauty of the movie. And at least we can be reminded that Earth can be an alien planet too – remember it was Lawrence of Arabia George Lucas was thinking of when he invented a planet called Tatooine.
But there is another even greater reason to see Lawrence of Arabia – which you can do at the Glasgow Film Theatre from Sunday until Tuesday – and that's the violence, or rather Lawrence's relationship to it.
Think of that scene near the start when Lawrence lets a match burn down until it singes his skin. He doesn't even flinch. "The trick," he says, " is not minding that it hurts."
And then later when Lawrence is captured and beaten by the Turks, there is that terribly ambiguous moment when we hear the whoosh and slap of the whip and the camera comes in close to his face. What is that expression? Stoicism? Pleasure?
That's the great mystery, and joy, of the movie. Perhaps Lawrence was a masochist. Perhaps he was a sadist (he admits to his superior that he enjoyed executing one of his men). Perhaps he was, like so many other great men, excited and turned on by violence. And yet Lawrence was a sensitive man too, appalled by war and killing. He was complicated, that was the thing, which makes him better than most heroes, who are never complicated.
And he was one more thing. "These are tributes for the prince and flowers for the men," says an Arab to Lawrence at one point. "I am more than those things," says Lawrence. "What then?" asks the Arab and Lawrence says: "I don't know." He was uncertain, and heroes are rarely that either.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article