The Army has told most of its soldiers and civilian staff to stay at home for 25 days over Christmas.
It's a thank-you for sterling service. But mostly it's to save on electricity bills and other overheads as barracks and headquarters lie empty.
This is a start. Before we know it the Army will be saving lives as well as electricity. I am no expert in military logistics but I reckon almost all our troops could be home from Afghanistan in time for Christmas. With no need to go back.
The first step is to admit a British presence is not going to make any lasting difference in Afghanistan. The second step is to decide our boys and girls are not target practice for the Taliban in Afghan army uniforms.
Think of the savings in electricity (and lives) if many of the barracks, bases, and other defence properties never opened up again. Think of the possibilities of a stay-at-home military.
Granted there will be issues. Not everyone will be able to park an armoured vehicle in the driveway. Not every garden is big enough for a Chinook helipad. (If we had kept those Harrier jump jets, a few pilots could have turned home into a base.)
If our armed forces were about defence (and not pretending to be a world superpower) we could get by with a Home Guard. I am prepared to volunteer for the role of Private Fraser to advise on the extent to which we are all doomed. There is no shortage of citizens with experience of bayonets which enemies will not like up them. The order of the day is don't panic.
I have no O-level in geopolitics but it seems a home defence force works well enough for the Swiss who have avoided wars for centuries and whose army knife is the envy of the world.
Whether we are independent Scots or devolved Brits, there will be a need for a small professional army, navy, and air force. With the emphasis on professional and well-equipped.
We Scots do the military thing very well. We would have some kind of role in policing this warlike planet. And we will have to hold on to some small enclaves of empire. Our sojers, sailors, and airmen will need interesting places to go on manoeuvres in the sun.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article