A SPOKESMAN for the Scottish Government repeatedly used the term "strike" to characterise the protest action being taken by those defence agents not employed by the state ("Strike action by lawyers condemned", The Herald, December 4).
It is not strike action to refuse to do work for which there is no remuneration offered. My colleagues across the country appear daily in custody courts in summary cases where there is no remuneration offered by the Scottish Legal Aid Board for doing so.
Every day we appear as a courtesy to the court and to our clients in cases where people plead not guilty, without any means of remuneration and at the cost of other remunerative work which we must forego.
Justice Secretary Kenny McAskill has never praised the criminal bar for this public service which is offered daily and without any cost to the public purse but presumes, when it is withdrawn, to instruct his taxpayer-funded spokesman to characterise the bar as acting purely to protect its own fee entitlements.
Those taking the protest action are seeking to defend our criminal justice system from a Justice Secretary who has failed to answer any of the criticisms made of his bill by the Justice Committee but plainly seeks to bully and bluster his way out of this debacle.
This, and the failure of the SNP members of the Justice Committee to sustain their objections to the bill (for reasons they have yet to explain to the public) has left the criminal bar with no option but to withdraw our free goodwill attendances in the custody court.
We can only hope that the public will take notice of what is being done in their name to hinder the right of Scots to a fair trial.
Colin Bissett,
Airdrie Society of Solicitiors,
14 Avonhead Road,
Cumbernauld.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article