Attempting to get more students from poorer backgrounds into St Andrews (pictured)– or any university – is important, but misses the point if the focus is entirely on getting more bums from poor backgrounds onto the same seats that have been occupied for generations by the privileged (Why are so few pupils from deprived backgrounds getting into one of Scotland's top universities?, Special report, December 2).
If successful, this strategy might enable more young people to use education to climb the social ladder and leave poverty behind, but the poverty, its causes and the communities which experience it remain.
Resources should be aimed not so much at getting students in, but rather at getting the universities to go out into the real world of poverty to join those who are trying to tackle the problem. University initiatives that support community projects and campaign groups challenging inequality and other social problems remain marginal, poorly funded and often subsidised by other public and voluntary sector organisations.
Universities are a tremendous public resource, funded from everyone's taxes for social benefit. They are not just for those who sit in the lectures and graduate with degrees, irrespective of their social background.
Eurig Scandrett
North Berwick
Marc Lambert addresses Scotland's literacy problem without reference to the inconsistencies in the language (Writing wrongs, Essay of the week, December 2). Despite the repeated ululations of educators, politicians, employers and the like, things can only get worse due to the technological revolution. Today's youngsters play fast and loose with traditional spelling, with their abbreviated text messages and chat rooms. Academia, if it ever thought of making some adjustments has, I fear, missed the boat - and the young will take it all in their stride.
George B Anderson
Dunfermline
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article