I note your coverage of an event hosted by Museums Galleries Scotland to begin to organise the Scottish dimension of the decision of the UK Government to "celebrate" the opening shots of the First World War ("Uniform support", December 10).
As Prime Minister David Cameron said when he launched the £50 million initiative (no doubt Scotland's share will be about £5m) at the Imperial War Museum, it is to be like the Diamond Jubilee celebrations that will "capture" the national spirit.
The date of the commemoration, 2014 for 1914, is a curious one: the actual commencement of hostilities, not the cessation. However strange though the choice of date is it presents intriguing possibilities.
As well as providing funds for conventional museum activities and interactive events, I do hope serious consideration will be given to funding mock re-enactments of demonstrations of the mass pro-war hysteria that swept the streets of many European cities and towns.
Perhaps the military analytical community, quick to provide comment on our current dangerous and uncertain world without actually identifying any significant potential state enemies, might organise some conferences to study how the decision to go to war was not so much a decision made by the leaders of the day rather the result of military institutional momentum.
Military institutional momentum is something they are quite familiar with: their familiarity with the ways of the 21st-century arms industry.
Bill Ramsay,
84 Albert Avenue, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article