Assuming you had some in the first place and could lay your hands on them in a hurry, the only truthful answer to the question: "What would you save from a burning house?" is: "My love letters".
Diaries are personal too, of course, but there is no more lasting memorial of a relationship than letters written between people who have shared pillow time.
Time only adds to their piquancy, one of the reasons a set of 10 love letters written in the heady summer of 1969 has just sold at Sotheby's for £187,000. Another is that they were written by a 25-year-old Mick Jagger to American-born actress Marsha Hunt, then 23 and later the subject of one of his most celebrated songs, Brown Sugar.
The Rolling Stones singer, who was still in a relationship with Marianne Faithfull at the time, was in Australia filming Ned Kelly. American-born Hunt was living in Upper Woburn Place in Bloomsbury – we know because that's the address on the envelopes – and was starring in the West End production of Hair. A year-and-a-half after the letters were written, the couple had a daughter, Karis.
The end of the 1960s saw "the ebbing of a crucial, revolutionary era, highly influenced by such artists as The Beatles, The Rolling Stones, James Brown and Bob Dylan", Hunt said after the sale. "Their inner thoughts should not be the property of only their families, but the public at large, to reveal who these influential artists were – not as commercial images, but their private selves." Besides, she added, she needs the money.
It wouldn't happen now, of course: it's hard to imagine a trove of letters surfacing in 40 years to reveal the private, innermost thoughts of today's celebrity couples. We have Twitter and YouTube for that.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article