While I agree that inequality in access to primary care services has to be addressed, there are just as important and more fundamental causes of Scotland's poor health record ("Health inequalities persist despite £2bn investment", The Herald, December 13 & Letters, December 14).
We are already too far down the league tables and have some of the worst health in Europe.
While access to health services is very important for population health, it is also true that poverty, and its consequent poor housing, poor nutrition, stress and stigma, all contribute to poor health. We are making progress on smoking and alcohol, but good food and decent housing will be in short supply. We all have to recognise that health in Scotland is not going to be improved by the dismantling of the welfare safety net.
There are some things that could be done quickly. A free hot and nutritious school meal for every child would do much to mitigate the poverty of both the working and the non-working families who will be affected by benefit reductions or withdrawals. Allotments for all, to increase the supply of cheap food. But much more than this is needed and could be done.
We do not need to wait for independence to take action to make Scotland a fairer and healthier country. We can begin now. Instead of waiting until 2014 and beyond, what is wrong with Parliament starting now?
As for funding it? The Parliament could start using its extra tax-raising powers now to raise the extra revenue needed. Do we really think tax rises for those on higher incomes would be any harder to sell politically than no smoking and less alcohol? I don't.
Maggie Mellon,
3a Fettes Row, Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article