WHAT did we do before barcodes?
Perhaps our object of desire needed weighing or looking up in a book of prices.
It takes us back to an era where we did our shopping in individual shops, rather than supermarkets, and often had to discuss our order with the person serving. How awful.
Now everything is pre-packaged complete with the symbol of modern commerce, the barcode.
I write in the wake of the recent death of Norman Joseph Woodland, co-inventor of the stripy, information-packed doodah. Previously, Norman had just mucked about on the US military's atomic Manhattan Project.
More important work awaited him. It was inspired after he and his co-inventor, Bernard Silver, heard of a grocer's plea for an invention that would quickly capture product information at the checkout.
Like all good former Boy Scouts, Mr Woodland knew Morse Code and, one day at the beach, while absently drawing dots and dashed in the sand, was inspired to change these to thick and thin bars. A patent was issued in 1952 but it was another 20-odd years before lasers made it possible to read the code and dae something useful with it.
Now it has become — to use a controversial but, in my view, legitimate word — iconic. Some citizens even have barcodes tattooed on their necks or other places of interest. The United Nations has designated these people "nutters".
You say: "One thing I'd really like to know is this: what was the first item scanned by barcode?" That is a fine question and the answer is this: a packet of Wrigley's chewing gum. The place: Troy, Ohio. The year: 1974.
For better or worse, barcodes ushered in the Age of Beep, in which our lives are lived to an accompaniment of little plinky noises. But they're worth it.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article