LET'S have fun with taxonomy.
However, before we do, let me be up front and confess that, before researching this learned nonsense, I wasn't clear what taxonomy was.Words set off all sorts of associations in the brainlobes, with some parts of the cranial interior lighting up brightly and others remaining resolutely dark.
In my dimmer recesses – covering roughly 92.8% of the landmass – taxonomy sounded like something to do with stuffing things economically. It means no such thing, as you probably know. There are umpteen definitions out there – is nothing simple? – but since you and I are busy men and women of the world, I'll define taxonomy for our purposes as the classification and naming of species. If you have another definition, go away.
My attention was attracted to the practice upon reading of the Obamadon gracilis. Already your forensic skills tell you this is named after yon President Barack Obama.
The taxonomers – is that a word? – under advisement insist they mean nothing derogatory by the ascription. "We're just having fun with taxonomy," they say, proving that it takes all sorts. Obamadon gracilis was a tiny lizard that disappeared along with the dinosaurs. Those of you fluent in Latin, as distinct from those of us who just look things up on Google, will know that odon is the Latin for tooth while gracilis means slender.
Slender Tooth Obama: kinda has a ring to it. Further research in taxonomy (see the Null Hypothesis website) throws up such delights as Abra cadabra (a mollusc); Apopyllus now (a particularly nasty spider); Eubetia bigaulae ("you betcha, by golly", a moth, as you would expect).
Another website, Buzzfeed, highlights Vini vidivici (the conquered parakeet) and Ytu brutus (a Brazilian water beetle). Scientists and their wacky sense of humour, eh?
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article