I fully support Scotland's new single police force and understand the financial constraints placed upon it but would urge senior officers to consider the valuable work of police dogs and their handlers ("Dogs face redundancy in police service shake-up", The Herald, December 27).
I was a dog handler with Strathclyde Police for approximately 20 years, until 1998, in a specialist role as explosive search handler and general purpose handler with the search support group.
During my service the strength of the dog section was about 100 dogs. General purpose police dog cover was split into three shifts covering Strathclyde with about 12 dogs per shift on a good day.
However, due to training for licensing, which is a requirement for the dogs to operate, specialist duties such as royal visits, drug dog searches, annual leave or sickness, you would be lucky to find five dogs per shift.
With a missing person search or a murder the strength would be reduced almost to nothing. It would not be unusual for a dog from the Glasgow area being tasked to Oban or Campletown for a search, with return travelling time of about seven hours.
I am informed the total strength for the new Scottish force will be 135 dogs. That would make the actual strength fewer than 40 general purpose and specialist dogs to cover all of Scotland for a 24-hour period.
With the vast distances these handlers and dogs will have to travel and the more specialists roles undertaken, I believe there is an argument not to decrease the strength but to increase it.
Ian Palmer,
92 Hillend Crescent,
Clarkston.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article