THE figures for Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (Gers), which once seemed fairly arcane, will become one of the central battlegrounds in the debate about independence.
The SNP claims there is an economic as well as a political case for independence. Specifically, it asserts that Scots would be individually £500 better off from an independence dividend from the £2.7 billion surplus Scotland contributes to the UK Treasury.
The Treasury has now run its own calculations based on the Gers figures and concludes that, while the £500 rebate would have been the case in 2010/11, on average over the 12 years since devolution, Scots would have been £1 worse off. Taking every year since 1999 and assuming a geographical share of North Sea oil and gas, Scotland's fiscal balance has averaged minus 3.8%. Without oil and gas revenues, this increases to minus 10.9%, according to the Treasury.
SNP Finance Secretary, John Swinney has made much of the latest available Gers figures, which show Scotland generated 9.4% of UK tax with 8.4% of the population – the equivalent of £1000 extra for every man, woman and child. In light of the Treasury calculations over the 12 years of devolution, his assertion that Scotland's fiscal position is in a far stronger position than that of the UK "year after year" is clearly open to question.
The essential problem with statistics is that they provide only a snapshot. By including some years but not all, Mr Swinney can justify his claim. However, in eight of the 12 years since devolution, a separate Scottish economy would have had a fiscal deficit. Generally, the more evidence that is taken into account, the more reliable the conclusion should be. The exception to this rule of thumb is when one element is expected to change significantly. In the case of the Scottish economy, the volatile factor is North Sea oil and gas revenues.
The Office of Budget Responsibility (OBR) has forecast that, by 2017-18 , oil revenues would be 50% lower than what had been expected at the time of the 2011 Budget. However, industry analysts are currently forecasting sufficient stability to maintain the present high levels of investment, suggesting that only exceptional events would cause a sharp downturn. Nevertheless, revenues will decline over the medium term and much of the SNP's policy depends on oil tax revenues generating £1 billion a year.
It is the nature of political dispute that different interpretations will be put upon the available evidence. Voters might be exasperated by conflicting claims. The more independent and unaligned the available information is, the better it will be for those who will decide Scotland's future in or outside the UK.
If Scots are to make their decision with confidence, they must be able to rely on the neutrality of the facts and figures on which all assertions are based.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article