I recall back in the 1960s STV ran a contest entitled A Song For Scotland.
I heard a couple of workmates discussing the show and, intrigued, asked them what the songs were like. "Och, ye ken, the usual," came the reply, "Marchin' through the heather up tae the oxters in peat!'
Half a century on, I have transmogrified from a young joiner into an elderly poet and often think about that remark because it taught me a lesson: just inserting all the right ingredients into a poem or song doesn't mean it will be good or memorable.
That is the problem I have with the lyrics offered on your Letters Pages (January 1 & 7). They are puddings which have been over-egged. A national anthem should convey a simple message and not be just a list of high-flown phrases; when I hear lines like "hearts beat strong and true", I cringe.
My own preference would be for an anthem in Scots, written by our national bard and conveying the sentiments of brotherhood that most Scottish people empathise with.
I realise others have suggested Is There For Honest Poverty. It is to me the outstanding candidate. Failing that, we should settle for what is the people's choice, Flower of Scotland.
It is not anti-English to celebrate a battle that paved the way for Scotland to assert its right to be recognised as a nation.
Is it any worse than the wonderful poetic prose of Shakespeare's speech, in Henry V, about a "band of brothers" on "St Crispin's Day"?
I've never heard anyone describes that as anti-French.
David C Purdie,
12 Mayburn Vale, Loanhead, Midlothian.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article