The Scots pine as our official tree – perfect ("Scots pine branching out to be symbol of the nation", The Herald, January 7).
Not only is it beautiful, rugged and long-lived, (though now reduced to a tiny percentage of its original coverage in places like Loch Tulla and Glen Falloch), but it is host to iconic Scottish species such as the red squirrel, crested tit, capercaillie and to the Scottish crossbill, a bird unique to Scotland and to the Caledonian forest.
The golden eagle is perfect as our national bird, and if we ever get fed up with the jagginess of the thistle, we have our own uniquely Scottish primrose. I can be accused of prejudice, as a sprig of pine was the badge of clan Macgregor, but I still say "Hurrah for Pinus sylvestris". Let's have it.
Jimmie Macgregor,
Life member, RSPB Scottish Wildlife Trust and John Muir Trust,
16 Holyrood Crescent, Glasgow.
THE pines in your report seem to be lodge pole pines, from North America, so called due to their use as native American teepee or lodge poles, harvested as younger trees and valued for this use due to their straightness. The cartoon on page 13 is erroneous, depicting a similar tree with straight perpendicular trunk. Scots pines are, as you report, the main species in the treasured remnants of the Caledonian Forest, found on Deeside, Speyside and Glen Affric, but many areas of the ancient forest of Caledon were damaged by interplanting of their North American cousins during the war for emergency timber supply.
The Scots pine is a swarthy, muscular, contorted tree designed to stand fast against, for example the howling winds blasting down Glen Feshie or Glen Derry.
J D Moir,
Hilton Street,
Aberdeen.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article