WHEN Nicola Sturgeon was moved from the health portfolio last year to take charge of the Government's referendum campaign she was instantly dubbed the "Yes Minister".
Now her successor as Health Secretary, Alex Neil, has been given a new nickname of his own: the "Clean Up the Mess Minister".
He seems rather taken with it.
Mr Neil managed to maintain a diplomatically stony expression when Scots Labour leader Johann Lamont took aim during First Minister's Questions but it didn't take long for the mask to slip. Confronted by hacks during the post-FMQs garden lobby melee, Mr Neil chuckled, smiled a knowing little smile and sauntered off. What he did not do – as Ms Sturgeon might have hoped – was to look aghast and protest loudly: "Mess? What mess?"
Labour's dig follows a slew of stories about problems in Scotland's health service. Recent front-page headlines have referred to a "failing IVF unit" at Glasgow Royal Infirmary and the growing health inequalities between Scotland's richest and poorest communities. There have been reports of patients waiting for 12 hours "in Scotland's A&E crisis" and warnings of further ward closures.
Earlier this week The Herald revealed an ongoing culture of secrecy at NHS Lothian, the health board found guilty of manipulating waiting times to meet Government targets. This latest mess, by the way, was swiftly cleaned up by Mr Neil.
Added to that we know the number of nurses is falling and Scotland's health boards are having to borrow to balance the books. There is a £950m repairs backlog. The Auditor General, Caroline Gardner, said cash constraints had placed the NHS on an "amber warning".
Some of these issues were put to the First Minister on Thursday. He dismissed the criticism on two grounds – firstly that the NHS was better funded than it would have been under a Labour administration and secondly that it retained the confidence of patients, recording an 88% satisfaction rating according to the latest Scottish Household Survey.
It's true that at the last election the SNP promised to "protect" the NHS budget to a greater extent than Labour – but that does not mean health chiefs are awash with cash. The service faces real-terms cuts. As for patient satisfaction, Mr Salmond's point is undermined somewhat by separate figures showing a steep rise in NHS complaints last year.
The real point, though, is this: whatever the merits of Mr Salmond's defence, the health service is becoming a political battleground.
During her five years in charge of the NHS Ms Sturgeon created an image of a well-resourced, well-run organisation that was meeting ever more ambitious targets and was trusted by patients.
For the most part that was true. It was striking how rarely the NHS was the subject of embarrassing headlines.
No longer. Opposition parties now paint a picture of a health service which is struggling to cope, where cash is tight, where staff are overstretched, where pressure to meet targets is breeding a culture of secrecy and bullying, where services are under threat and where patients are losing out.
It's hard to judge at this stage whether that's a fair characterisation. But it is clear the new Health Secretary will not sit back and simply take the flak for problems in the NHS which pre-date his time in office. He knows it is better for him to be a pro-active Clean Up the Mess Minister than sweep things under the carpet, even if it means acknowledging the occasional mess.
And – good news for everyone – that means we should have a better chance of seeing an open and robust debate about the state of health service and how it should be run in tough financial times.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article