A CHECK on the retail prices of alcohol over the festive season shows exactly why we need minimum unit pricing.
The big four supermarkets all offered major discounts on branded beer, wines and spirits. One-litre bottles of spirits were on sale for £14, which works out at 35p per unit. The cheapest product per unit was a cider which was on sale at just 18p per unit.
Anyone wishing to avoid the lure of cheap alcohol would have a very difficult time. Alcohol is promoted as an essential part of everyday life, which creates enormous difficulties for people who are trying to reduce their drinking or are recovering from alcohol dependency. Should they wish to buy an alcohol-free lager or wine, they would find it very difficult to locate these products amongst the rows and rows of alcoholic drinks. In many stores, alcohol-free lager is positioned right beside super-strength lager.
Minimum pricing will target high-strength drinks sold at the cheapest prices and will have the biggest effect on the heaviest drinkers. The majority of people, particularly those who drink in pubs, clubs and restaurants, will not notice any difference to their pockets. What we will see is a country where fewer people's lives are damaged by alcohol.
By seeking to delay this vital health measure through legal challenge, the Scotch Whisky Association and their European counterparts are following in the footsteps of their colleagues in the tobacco industry. It is quite simply big business putting profit before public health.
These delaying tactics will cost lives in Scotland.
Dr Evelyn Gillan,
Alcohol Focus Scotland,
166 Buchanan Street,
Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article