STUFF: it's everywhere.
It's spilling out of boxes, it's cluttering up the hall, it's choc-a-bloc in cupboards, it's stacked against the wall.
What can we do with it all? Well, we can put it in storage, of course. I'm about to use one of those curiously soulless warehouses, therein to bung an assortment of books, DVDs, CDs, furnishings, guitars and, you know, whatnot.
I use the word "bung" advisedly. I'm far too busy to have proper systems for things, and the objects will just end up where they're lobbed. What's the point of stashing away objects carefully? You never, ever find what you're looking for anyway.
If that's what it's like for mere mortals, what must it be like for Amazon? You've probably seen, or even passed on the motorway, the online retailer's massive warehouses.
If I order The Macrobiotic Cure for Syphilis - "slight fraying to edge of cover; allow two years for delivery" — how do they know where to find it? Maybe Amazon parcels take so long to come because they've had to send someone off with a rucksack and five day's provisions to find your tome or other object of desire.
But, according to a film on the BBC's website, Amazon uses "chaotic storage" to help its pickers locate stuff.
It's not all that chaotic. They know which aisle the object's in, but the chaos lies in how the objects are placed next to each other: higgledy, as it were, piggledy.
They don't put similar items together. Books aren't placed beside other books (at least of similar size), nor bottles with other bottles, nor wigs with wigs. By putting objects of different shape and size next to each other, it's easier to find the one you want.
Amazon calls it "random stow". It's been hailed as revolutionary. But I've been doing it for years.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article