IT is, of course, good news that the health of the Duchess of Cambridge, pictured, has been improving and that all seems to be well for the birth later this year of another addition to the House of Windsor ("Baby due in July", The Herald January 15).
We will then have the monarchy assured for three further generations in the form of Prince Charles, Prince William, and the Prince/Princess yet to be named. This is obviously a stage beyond what is known as "belt and braces".
Some of us will have to be brave about being faced with month upon month of a media frenzy concerning the birth of this privileged child, to be ennobled from day one of its existence. No doubt there will be a plethora of special supplements and documentaries to regale those of a royalist disposition .
One is tempted to speculate concerning the kind of world in which the young prince or princess will attain adulthood.
Will Scotland still be in the UK ?
Will the UK still be in Europe?
Will the euro still be in circulation ?
Will the Taliban be ruling again in Afghanistan ?
Will China have overtaken the United States as the world's leading superpower ?
Will there have been a constitutional revolution in the UK leading to the introduction of a non-hereditary head of state ? The answer to all the above questions is "probably yes" with the exception of the last.
If one excludes the don't-knows, the don't-cares, and the undecided, it seems that for the foreseeable future, notwithstanding some growth of the republican movement, the majority in the UK are inclined to the preservation of the status quo and are prepared to accept all that comes with the package known as the royal family.
Ian W Thomson,
38 Kirkintilloch Road,
Lenzie.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article