There has been a bit of coverage about NHS targets recently ("Neil orders under-fire health boards to tell all", The Herald, January 11).
I require an operation on a cataract in my left eye. My appointment at The Golden Jubilee was for 8.30am and I was seen by a very efficient nurse at 9.30am for about an hour. The surgeon came in the afternoon and I saw him for about half an hour.
Both were extremely efficient and helpful, answering all my questions. They asked about my availability and I told them I was going on holiday for a week on October 23 and that I had a gig with my ceilidh band, which would involve me having to move my heavy PA, on November 30. This did not seem to present any problems at the time.
I was given an appointment for October 19 and when I phoned up I was told there would be no problem about flying. When asked about lifting suitcases I was told I would not be able to do so for about six weeks so I had, with great regret, to turn down this appointment.
I reiterated that, as I had made clear in my preliminary interviews, the ideal time for me would be in early December. To my astonishment I was told this was outside the target period and I would have to re-refer myself; that is, go back to square one.
My cataract is deteriorating every week and fortunately my right eye is fine and I can go about my daily life, although I am finding it increasingly difficult to read and I have to use a magnifying glass to do The Herald crossword.
I have since had another eye test and my optician has re-referred me and my doctor has written a letter.
This all happened three months ago and I have not heard another thing about an appointment.
It is hard to see why this target setting is helpful to anyone other than those submitting statistics about "successful" outcomes.
Miller Frondigoun,
3 Maxwell Drive,
Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article