President Bill Clinton left office with his reputation diminished after being impeached for perjury with regard to his relationship with Monica Lewinsky.
And if David Cameron or any head of government were ever unfortunate enough to be be found by the police in a public place in flagrante delicto with a woman other than his wife committing adultery for the first time one can only wonder what fire-storm of adverse publicity would descend on him (provided it wasn't subject to a D notice and we actually found out about it).
Thankfully Glasgow has a far more tolerant attitude to sexual peccadilloes as can be witnessed by the handling of Glasgow City Council leader Gordon Matheson's recent brush with the police. As you say in your editorial ("Challenge faced by council leader to restore reputation", The Herald, January 19), his colleagues have rallied round him and I am certain self-interest plays no part in this circling of the wagons.
Mercifully we and his fellow councillors are adult enough to be able to divorce behaviour in public life from that in private life and appreciate that somebody who cannot be trusted by his partner can be as straight as a die in a professional capacity.
David J Crawford
Flat 3/3, 131 Shuna Street,
Glasgow.
Like many others, I think Cllr Matheson should resign from his post. He has brought more shame to the City Chambers.
The fact the procurator-fiscal has decided not to prosecute raises a large question mark. Being caught committing an offensive act and openly admitting to it shows Cllr Matheson's arrogance.
A man with his morals should leave the council and keep his personal preferences indoors, not in a public park. What if children had witnessed the act? He has shown the electorate he is both arrogant and shameless.
Alexander Lindsay,
184 Baldwin Avenue,
Knightswood, Glasgow.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article