HARKEN!
Yes, a wee word in praise of listening. We don't do it as much as we used to. I'm thinking of music in particular. It has moved so much into the background that we rarely focus on it now.
I witter thus after reading an eloquent letter from an older gentleman in a prog rock mag. He was lamenting the days of vinyl, not just for the material and its alleged superiority in conveying sound, but for the whole process of taking out an album and sitting down to listen to it.
The big artwork of LPs gave you something to look at as you listened. In a sense, it helped you to focus on the listening. It was part of the whole experience.
Today, with downloads and even CDs with packages in tiny print, it seems harder to focus on the music. You put it on and do something totally different that distracts your attention.
We're all multi-tasking noo, and can't just bask exclusively in Beethoven, Beiderbecke or even yonder Beatles.
It's the same at rock and pop concerts. The audience, particularly at the back near the bar, gabs all through the performance. They bought the T-shirt but they're disrespectful to the artists.
Sometimes, the bands themselves don't help. "Let's hear you make some noise!" they shout. And I think: "Er, no. That's what I paid you for. I'm here to listen." As for those that exhort you to dance, if I could clamber up on stage, it would be to make a citizen's arrest. Why won't they just let us listen, preferably from a seated position?
Possibly, listening is going the way of reading: we don't have time for it nowadays. But we should make time. Clear the decks, perhaps put on headphones, and give your ears a treat.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article