In a world full of Jennifers and Laurens, Jacks and Pauls, I've always liked being a Carrie.
Growing up, there weren't many other Carries around, and I liked that. Dealing with people mis-spelling it or mistaking it for another name was worth it, as I liked having an unusual moniker.
My parents compiled a shortlist of names before I was born, including options such as Jocelyn and Erin, before settling on calling me Carrie.
I am grateful that they thought outside the box and didn't opt for one of the popular names of the time. I should also thank Stephen King for doing his best to make the name as unpopular as possible by choosing to write a horror novel titled Carrie. When the movie was released in 1976, the name hit rock bottom.
I was born in 1983 and for some that wasn't enough distance from the troubled character. Certain relatives raised questions (and eyebrows) upon hearing my given name.
But Sex and the City helped change the perception of the name, and it went from being associated with a telekinetic weirdo to a glamorous and fashionable New Yorker. All in all, a pretty decent trade up.
And it isn't just my parents who are getting creative. We are making more unusual choices when it comes to naming our offspring. Instead of raising a nation of John and Roberts, we are now more likely to plump for Riley, Ethan or Tyler, according to recent collations of Scottish baby names. Likewise, our daughters are now more likely to be called something like Olivia, Isla or Ruby than plainer old favourites.
Long may it continue, as having a name that makes you stand out from the crowd has definitely worked for me.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article