The irony of the recent events in the Mid Staffordshire Hospital, where patients were scandalously neglected, is that it would cost not a penny more to implement what is basic nurse care ("Shut failing hospitals, urges inquiry into NHS deaths", The Herald, February 7).
The problem arises when existing senior staff have neither time nor trained nurses to carry out what was once the hallmark of the Scottish reputation for excellence, here and abroad.
I, and other retired nurses, have been very concerned to see these standards fall over the years when management became top-heavy at the expense of phasing out nurses in the wards and in some NHS nursing homes. To bring in robots and the hand-cleansing dispensers at entrances to hospital wards can never be a substitute for good medical practices and hands-on staff who are encouraged to spend time with patients in their care.
Janet Cunningham,
1 Cedar Avenue, Stirling.
Jody Harrison's article rightly highlights the appalling failings at the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust, so graphically and eloquently described in QC Robert Francis's lengthy and powerful report. He emphasised the systemic failures and lack of leadership from the Department of Health, via the so-called regulatory bodies, to the wards themselves where so many patients suffered from lack of care and proper medical attention. In these circumstances how can people like the head of the NHS and the chief executive of the Royal College of Nursing possibly remain in post?
I hope Julie Bailey's remarkable efforts as a fearless, articulate campaigner will be amply recognised in the Birthday Honours List – her late mother would be very proud of her. At least she has shown courage, integrity and leadership in her pursuit of answers.
Ronald J Sandford,
1 Scott Garden, Kingsbarns.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article