DEATH is not the end, not any more, not online, not if you don't want it to be.
When your heart stops beating, you'll keep tweeting, promises a terrifying new Twitter app.
Launching next month, LivesOn uses algorithms to analyse your online behaviour so it can Tweet on topics you enjoy – used to enjoy? What tense is appropriate here? – as well as "favourite" items and post links to articles you would recommend had you not unfortunately ceased to be. It learns to be you over time.
I find tweeting and Facebooking arduous enough. But I imagine those signed up have to be as sparkling as possible to make sure their after-death efforts live up to hard-won virtual reputations. The intent, to create an e-memorial to yourself, is not new: DeadSocial and If I Die post predetermined messages after the user is gone but LivesOn is the first to actively take over your identity. Creepy enough are these sites awaiting confirmation of your death, an extension of writing letters to loved ones to be opened after your passing.
Dave Bedwood, a creative partner at Lean Mean Fighting Machine, the firm behind the scheme, said: "Cryogenics costs a fortune; this is free and I'd bet it will work better than a frozen head."
That's a bold claim. I imagine Twitter feeds and frozen heads have fairly dissimilar uses – who can say which will come in handiest?
I'm not sure how the bereaved move on when there's still a live feed to look at. It's like picking over the corpse of a dead relationship by keeping an eye on your ex's Facebook page. It's not healthy and makes me feel more than a little uneasy, unless you're over the person and just objectively interested. But let's face it, that's rare.
The firm's Twitter feed features the post: "God doesn't exist, servers do. Sign up to the real after life."
Can I sign up to the real before death? This could be useful. We could extend the idea to random column generation. It could figure out, on the balance of probability, what my opinion would be on any given subject and then write my copy for me.
Maybe it already has. Maybe I've been made redundant and this was churned out by a machine in a converted warehouse in Govan. You'll never know.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article