SACHA Baron Cohen is the latest star to be hit with the heinous allegation: recluse.
The creator and star of Ali G, Borat and The Dictator stands accused of the crime after failing to engage with Her Majesty's Media. Cohen is right rich noo, which I suppose makes him fair game, but the point is: he's not a recluse at all.
He lives a normal life. It's just that, unless he's in character at a time and place of his choosing, he doesn't pose for the paparazzi. Nor does he answer questions about his private life. Do that and you no longer have a private life.
The same charge of reclusion is levelled against The Goddess, Kate Bush, who asks only to be left alone to bring up her family and make her music. That doesn't make her a hermit.
This news just in about being a hermit: it ain't easy. Become a proper recluse and it won't be long before you start wearing hats made of turnip and sitting on the roof in your underpants singing I'm A Pink Toothbrush.
Taoist hermits in China left behind reams of poetry and, far from being inspirational and deep, often they consist of bitter complaints against the rest of the mankind for not being good enough.
But that doesn't make reclusion the ultimate crime, as the tabloids imply. Well, not imply. Tabloids don't imply. They shout. In their world view, the worst crimes are committed by "loners". However, closer inspection reveals these johnnies to be nothing of the sort. Indeed, the vast majority of crimes are committed by the sociable (and short-haired and clean-shaven, for that matter).
Of law-abiding Cohen, a "source" told one paper: "He makes no pretence that he would rather be reading a very serious book than swanning around at parties." Good man.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article