Skyscrapers of the future will be "living" buildings which cater for the needs of the inhabitants and put more into the environment than they take out.
This will be a welcome change from high flats of the past which, as any resident of a Glasgow multi will testify, were built at great expense, rapidly became uninhabitable and were then razed to the ground with a few sticks of dynamite.
The good news about the next generations of tall buildings comes from the research department of Arup, the engineering multinational behind such structures as the Pompidou Centre and the Sydney Opera House.
The flats will be "net-zero energy" so you don't have to give half your wages to Scottish Power. They will be heated by wind turbine, photovoltaic paint, and tanks of algae bio-fuel. This is entirely different from the algae in previous multi-storey flats which created damp but no heat.
The flats will be maintained by drone robots, so no problems trying to get a plumber or an electrician. And you don't have to make the robot a cup of tea. If major repairs are required, a really big drone robot will come and take away the entire flat (or pod as it is known) and put in a new one.
Each building will have food production modules with meat, poultry, vegetables and fish farms. Dinner will be some sea bass and asparagus from the module downstairs. You won't be popping out to the chip shop or Chinese takeaway.
The ground floor of the future skyscraper will house an art gallery or a theatre but probably not a bookmaker or an off-licence. If residents need to avail themselves of the bookie or the offie, transport will not be a problem. There will be a hub in the basement with an underground connection. That's assuming your tower block is located somewhere along the route of Glasgow's bijou subway system.
There will be car sharing. Many inhabitants will already be familiar with this concept where their vehicle is borrowed by a local joyrider.
I can see all this working fine in the Red Road flats mark II. But only if people don't pee in the lift or turn the house into a crack den. Or chuck the telly out the window. Not even a flat-screen TV.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article