IN any decision about adoption, the interests of the child must be paramount.
There is a good reason why the Scottish Government and Parliament legislated six years ago to allow same-sex couples to adopt jointly, and why every adoption agency in Scotland, except St Margaret's, welcomes such couples for assessment ("Charity's legal bid against gay adoption", The Herald, June 10). It is that the research evidence shows clearly that children do as well with same-sex parents as they do with mixed-sex parents.
There are several thousand children looked after by local authorities in Scotland who could benefit from adoption, but only a few hundred adoptions per year. Glasgow City Council is quite right to encourage adoption applications by same-sex couples as one way to provide more looked-after children with permanent families and homes.
Any charity in receipt of taxpayers' money to provide public services, as St Margaret's is, must do so without discrimination – after all, people regardless of race, religion, sexual orientation, and so on pay their taxes.
St Margaret's sister adoption agency in Edinburgh, St Andrew's, has welcomed same-sex couple applicants for several years.
Its annual review 2009/10 subsequently reported: "Our informal links with the church remain strong, and we are still the agency of choice for most Catholics wishing to adopt."
St Margaret's certainly provides a valuable service, and we hope that it will continue to do so, with full regard to the best interests of children, and in compliance with the law.
Tim Hopkins,
Equality Network,
30 Bernard Street,
Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article