It goes without saying that it will always be possible to find fault with the NHS.
With 140,000 staff and dealing with a million hospital admissions a year, there will always be room for improvement somewhere.
The Health Secretary Alex Neil understandably feels that the NHS is holding up well, given the punishingly difficult financial circumstances of the past seven years and, in many ways, it is. The Scottish Government has listened to NHS staff and is aware of the problems emerging as a consequence of the ageing population.
Work is ongoing on many fronts, from the National Dementia Strategy to the epic task of integrating health and social care, to make the service fit for purpose in the future.
It is understandable that the minister feels frustrated about criticisms of the NHS when he can point to several indicators that show it has improved, from nurse numbers to waiting times. Unfortunately, the fact that targets have been met does not alter the situation that some parts of the service are under great strain. That is why Mr Neil did not strike the right tone yesterday in a Scottish Parliament debate on the NHS called by Labour.
Mr Neil attacked Labour's health spokesman Neil Findlay for the "vacuous" motion he put before parliament, but in doing so risked being seen as dismissing the concerns, not just of the opposition but also of those health and social care professionals whose knowledge and experiences have helped inform the debate. Surely the minister did not intend to suggest that the Royal College of Nursing Scotland is wrong to voice its concerns that pressures once confined to winter are now being felt year-round or that, regardless of whether nurse numbers have met their target, there are not enough to cope with the demand from growing numbers of elderly patients? But there is a danger he will have been perceived as having done so.
Will members of the public who heard the debate have been reassured by it? It seems unlikely. Patients who have been left on trolleys for hours in A&E or families who have seen their loved ones moved multiple times between hospital wards would prefer politicians to discuss problems in the system much less confrontationally.
The growing stress on the NHS is not merely a matter for Mr Neil. It is a matter for everyone in Scotland. Since the summer, The Herald has been running a campaign, NHS: Time for Action, calling for a review of capacity within the service and its ability to cope with the growing demands placed upon it.
We have called for a public debate about priorities in the NHS and the possibility of the need for extra funding, perhaps through extra taxation, to pay for the service in future.
We have highlighted signs of strain in the system and have had the backing of doctors, nurses, other NHS and social care professionals, dementia campaigners and patients' representatives. It is essential that the issue is discussed calmly and constructively, and that problems are properly acknowledged and addressed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article